180 Following

Familiar Diversions

I'm a librarian who loves anime, manga, and reading a wide variety of genres.

Currently reading

Lying in Wait
Liz Nugent
Progress: 28/310 pages
The Shape of Water
Guillermo del Toro, Daniel Kraus
Progress: 72/313 pages
To Siri with Love: A Mother, Her Autistic Son, and the Kindness of Machines
Judith Newman
Princess Prince
Tomoko Taniguchi
Progress: 310/336 pages
Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness
Peter Godfrey-Smith
Progress: 41/255 pages
FREE: Locke & Key
Tatiana Maslany, Audible Studios, Joe Hill, Gabriel Rodríguez, Kate Mulgrew, Haley Joel Osment, Full Cast
Progress: 91/806 minutes

The Admiral's Penniless Bride (Harlequin Historical)

The Admiral's Penniless Bride - Carla Kelly It was hard for me to write this post. I consider this an okay book, and I thought the main characters made great friends, but I didn't really feel the romance.I'll guess I'll start off with one of the first things I noticed as I began reading the book: the cover is completely wrong. Unless that's supposed to be Sophie and her previous husband, the Harlequin art department goofed up by not even flipping the image so that it's the guy's right hand showing. Instead, we get a good view of his perfect, non-amputated left hand. I mean, come on, it's mentioned early on that Admiral Bright has a hook for a left hand.Once I got to the hook bit, I started wondering where Kelly was planning to go with it. I had never even thought of Regency-era prostheses before - surely people didn't actually wear hooks? I was looking forward to a good "penniless woman enters into a marriage of convenience" story, but I wasn't sure I liked the idea of the hero and his hook hand being turned into a joke.I've never read a contemporary romance in which the hero has a prosthesis, but Kelly writes about Bright's hook the way I imagine a prosthesis would be handled in a contemporary romance. Bright worries that Sophie may be disgusted by his hook and handless arm and is happy to learn that, right from the start, Sophie doesn't mind it one bit. Because Kelly doesn't treat the hook as a throwaway physical detail, it has an effect on what Bright can and cannot physically do (he can't hold a cup of tea in his right hand and open Sophie's door with the other, because his hook can't turn the knob), and the hook must be taken into account during sex scenes (no, nothing kinky, it's just that it needs to be taken off so no one gets stabbed).Kelly even tries to incorporate the hook into what I assume were supposed to be early romantic moments, such as the bit where Bright twirls a lock of Sophie's hair around his hook and, instead of pulling away, Sophie helps him. That didn't really fly with me, because I couldn't help but wonder if Sophie had ever dealt with someone with a prosthesis before (the questions she asked him indicated to me that the answer was probably "no"), and then I wondered if there shouldn't be at least a little awkwardness on her part. Sophie is never awkward about Bright's hook at all - all the awkwardness is on Bright's part, as he wonders if she really means it when she says his hook doesn't bother her.As I mentioned in my post about Julia Quinn's [b:When He Was Wicked|110396|When He Was Wicked (Bridgertons, #6)|Julia Quinn|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1274212205s/110396.jpg|1118162], I'm not a huge fan of romance novels that star widows or widowers. If the back of this book had mentioned that Sophie is a widow, I might not have picked it up. If it had also mentioned that Sophie had had a young son who died not long after her husband, I would have avoided the book like the plague. As it was, I cringed when these details came up. Although it seemed odd and possibly a little unrealistic that Sophie didn't grieve more for her husband and son in the book, I was willing to accept that the passage of time had softened her grief and that she was too practical to let grief keep her from continuing to live. I was happy Kelly didn't feel the need to force readers to slog through pages of grief and guilt.So, the hook and widow aspects were done reasonably well - it just took a while for me to be sure they weren't going to turn me away from the book. What carried me through my initial doubts about this book were Sophie and Bright's early conversations. They got along extremely well, and it showed in the way they talked to each other. They clicked so well conversationally that it didn't seem so much a stretch for them to agree to a marriage of convenience, despite them not knowing much about each other.I could imagine Sophie and Bright becoming friends, and, once they were married, I could imagine that friendship warming up a bit into something sexual, because it had been a while since either of them had had sex. The problem was, I really couldn't feel the romance in this book. I can't quite put my finger on why, either.Maybe I'm too young for the characters? I can't remember if Sophie's exact age is ever mentioned, but she's old enough to have been married and have had a young child, but young enough to get pregnant again (a bit of a spoiler, but it shouldn't come as too much of a shock, what with all the mentions of "our children" before Sophie and Bright even think about having sex with each other). I was guessing late 20s, early 30s for her. I know Bright's exact age was mentioned, although I can't find it in the book right now. He's 46, I believe. Both of them are well out of the giddy first romance stage, but I know I've read other romance novels with older main characters who came across as more romantic than this couple.Maybe there weren't enough scenes that felt romantic to me? Both Sophie and Bright have moments when they have warm, fuzzy feelings for each other - one of my favorites is when Sophie describes the little details that tell her Bright is in a good mood, details that make it seem like she's been married to him for years, even though she's only known him for three days - but... I don't know how to describe it. I'm sure there are people out there who have read or will read this book who'll disagree with me. As much as I enjoyed many of Sophie and Bright's scenes together, they just didn't click with me as a romantic couple. There was nothing in the book that put a silly grin on my face or made my heart go warm and mushy. Bright, in particular, did nothing for me as a romantic hero.Although I'd say I enjoyed the book overall, it was an uneven read for me. I really liked the beginning, when Bright and Sophie first met, Sophie accepted his offer, and Sophie arrived at Bright's home. Again, just like I wondered if Bright's hook would be turned into a joke, I wondered if the pornographic house and lawn decorations would lead into a goofy rest of the book. That didn't turn out the be the case. The house's interesting history gave Kelly the opportunity to introduce a few characters I assume she intended for readers to see as quirky (seeing as one of them had intended to rape Sophie, I don't care if he was in his eighties, he was just creepy).After a reasonably strong beginning, Bright and Sophie go visit their neighbors for help getting the staff necessary to turn their home into something less embarrassing, and every single visit turns out to be emotionally devastating in some way. They turn out to be their elderly Jewish neighbors' first visitors in 30 years. Then their other neighbor turns out to be connected to a painful part of Bright's past. As if Bright and Sophie's niceness and kindness hadn't already been underscored enough, Sophie insists that they hire on a few people she met while job-hunting at the beginning of the book, including, to name a few, a jobless governess, and a little girl who not only doesn't have a real name (her name is Twenty) but who was also being physically and sexually abused by her former employer. It got to the point where I felt like saying, "Enough already, I get that Sophie and Bright are the nicest of the nice people and better than anyone else."Thankfully, the seemingly unending examples of Sophie and Bright's goodness finally let up. The more romantic aspects of the book got into full swing - as I've already mentioned, they didn't do much for me. I ended up being more curious to see how things would turn out with respect to the secret Sophie was keeping from Bright. As far as that went, I was not happy with how Bright reacted to learning about Sophie's secret. As he himself later thought, he could have hurt her badly. He didn't, but he could have. I also thought it was a bit out of character for Bright to have fallen apart so much after Sophie left - I had considered him a fairly practical person who would have been more believable if he had concentrated single-mindedly on finding Sophie again, rather than closing himself up in his wine cellar and drinking himself stupid.Overall, I'm not sorry I read this, but I don't think it'll ever be a reread for me. I do think I'd probably pick up another one of Kelly's book's if I saw one I thought might appeal to me, just to see if I'd end up liking it more.(Original review, with read-alikes, posted on A Library Girl's Familiar Diversions.)